Skip to content
July 19, 2012 / Mathew Lyons

Ralegh’s reputation in the 20th century

This article first appeared in the July issue of History Today. It was part of the magazine’s regular ‘From the Archives’ feature, and is a response to an excellent 1998 essay by Robert Lawson-Peebles titled ‘The Many Faces of Sir Walter Ralegh’, which traced Ralegh’s reputation through history. Lawson-Peebles essay can be viewed in History Today’s archives here.

Sir Walter Ralegh did not have a good 20th century. As Robert Lawson-Peebles’ excellent 1998 article illustrates, but does not quite say, the man – whose heroic persona was so well fashioned it could shine through every era since that in which he made his name – has struggled to find an identity fit for the modern age.

This may in part be due to a kind of exhaustion: the narratives with which he has been most associated shared an expansive views of England’s destiny – whether in terms of its imperial ambition or, as among the Parliamentarians and radicals of the 17th century, of its providential role in history. These ideas of England are not mutually exclusive; but they are not synonymous either. But if such visions were Ralegh’s only gift to us, then it is no surprise that his iconography should seem stale and jaded: they belong firmly in our past.

Yet Ralegh is still famous. Clive Owen played him with a moodily old-fashioned swagger opposite Cate Blanchett in Elizabeth: The Golden Age (2007). He featured extensively – albeit unflatteringly – in a Blackadder episode. And anecdotes about Ralegh’s life still resonate, most notably the story of his laying a cloak on the ground to keep Elizabeth’s shoes clean. Indeed, Tom Stoppard and Marc Jacob were confident enough of its ubiquity to build a sequence on it in Shakespeare in Love (1998).

Such things are trivial, of course, but they indicate the tenacity of his purchase on our imaginations. More importantly, they also point to two facets of Ralegh that make him profoundly relevant to modern culture.

The first of these is that Ralegh was something very much like a celebrity during his lifetime. Certainly he achieved much and aspired to more, but the protean nature of his interests and ambitions were consistently overshadowed by his charisma, by the projection of an idea of himself as a star in the Elizabethan firmament, to be gazed at in envy and wonder.

The second is that Ralegh’s image was something he – and later his wife, Bess – laboured hard to establish and maintain. As Anna Beer established in her superb 2004 biography of the latter, Bess: The Life of Lady Ralegh, Wife to Sir Walter, after her husband’s death Bess proved herself to be a shrewd manipulator of the media, carefully releasing his often provocative unpublished political writings to obtain maximum impact and exposure.

But she was carrying on work Ralegh had begun himself. “In all that ever I observed in the course of worldly things,” he had written, “I ever found that men’s fortunes are oftener made by their tongues than by their virtues.” Whatever Ralegh’s other talents, he had a genius for self-imaging. If proof were needed for that statement it can be found in the fact that we have accepted Ralegh’s crafted versions of himself – the prophet of empire, the standard-bearer for political liberty, and so on – so readily for some four hundred years.

It follows from this that if we want to find a Ralegh for the 21st century we need an approach that questions what we think we know of him. The most fruitful recent insights into his life have come from those working on subjects tangential to him, through which we can glimpse a more complex, flawed and human character that belies the many myths. Anna Beer’s work is certainly one such, but I would also mention Alan Nelson’s Monstrous Adversary: The Life of Edward De Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford. Although some of groundwork had been laid by John Bossy and Dwight Peck, Nelson’s exploration of Oxford’s association with Ralegh in the late 1570s throws a brilliant light on the character and attitudes of the man before he found fame and favour.

Today, then, Ralegh’s status is less certain than it has ever been. He is that rare beast: a historical figure about whom everyone knows something, but whose greatness largely eludes us. Yet that could prove a blessing: finally free from the afterglow of his celebrity we may at last be able to examine his extraordinary allure without once again falling prey to it.

About these ads

4 Comments

Leave a Comment
  1. carol mcgrath / Jul 23 2012 9:57 am

    Matthew I really loved this and thank you for writing it. I am reviewing Shadow of the Night by Deborah Harkness in which Raliegh has leanings towards the occult. This book is a mix of fantasy and history but the writer is a professor and well informed. Her historical detail is superb especially the sense of how if we time travelled we could be perceived and how we would remark ‘stuff’. I actually like this book for originality but was Raliegh in truth interested in shadowy things? C

    • Mathew Lyons / Jul 24 2012 2:35 pm

      Hi Carol
      Thanks so much for leaving a comment – I’m delighted you liked the post!
      I have read Deborah Harkness’ book The Jewel House about the scientific community – if that’s the right phrase – in Elizabethan London, which was superb. To be honest, I didn’t know she wrote fiction! I must read some.
      The short answer to your question is about Ralegh yes, but with the caveat that the distinction between empirical enquiry (an anachronistic term, I know) and the occult was by no means all that clear in the period. Ralegh certainly was interested in science – he was an active patron of Thomas Harriot, probably England’s greatest scientific mind pre-Newton – and had a sceptical and enquiring cast of mind, surprisingly untroubled by many received ideas about the world. He himself was a keen chemist: he had a laboratory built for himself while he was in the Tower of London so he could conduct experiments. He knew Dee well.
      Ralegh was circled by accusations of atheism throughout his life and was, in fact, investigated on such a charge by church courts in 1594, following a dinner conversation with a local priest in which Ralegh questioned the existence of the soul. There is talk of a “School of Night” surrounding him at Durham House in the 1590s, including men like Harriot and Christopher Marlowe – but it’s pretty difficult to establish exactly what went on.
      Anyway, I think you may have inspired a proper blog post on the subject, Carol – so many thanks for that too! Apologies if the above is a bit cursory – do let me know if there is anything else I can help you with.
      Mathew

  2. Carol McGrath / Jul 25 2012 6:22 pm

    This is so brilliant because the second in the series by Harkness is about The School of the Night and these characters all feature. I am reviewing it. Best to read Discovery of Witches first and do read it. I think she is amazingly clever at mingling fantasy and science, the other world beliefs and science and her knowledge is superb. Thank you for that reply. I expect Dee but not Ralegh.

Trackbacks

  1. My article in July issue of History Today « Mathew Lyons

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,808 other followers

%d bloggers like this: